On 20 January 2013 11:13, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 06:53:27PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 01/19/2013 04:58 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > >Error: Package: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-11.git20121211.fc19.i686 > (fedora) > > > Requires: libnl-genl-3.so.200 > > > Removing: libnl3-3.2.14-1.fc18.i686 (@anaconda/18) > > > libnl-genl-3.so.200 > > > Updated By: libnl3-3.2.19-1.fc19.i686 (fedora) > > > Not found > > > > > > > > >Anyone know whats going on ? > > > > > There was an email recently about libnl being updated and that > > breakage would likely happen. The rebuilds (and fixing) are > > probably not complete yet. > > .. and since that email was sent, the soname version of libnl3 has > been bumped *again* (to 201!). Thus breaking all the packages again > which had been rebuilt, eg. libvirt, libguestfs. > > Could the libnl maintainer ask upstream not to use such a daft soname > scheme? Or perhaps we should just override it with a sane one in > Fedora. > Thanks I will check things out and if fixed try again tomorrow. Many thanks, Aaron
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
