On 01/18/2013 01:00 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Marc Deop Argemí <m...@marcdeop.com> wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 12:18:19 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689127
(performance problem with virtual machines)
I must add that, in my experience, the performance is *bad* not only in virtual
machines but in the whole user experience (I've been using btrfs in my /home
partition for a while now and I'm sorry to say that it's really slow compared
to ext4).
In my humble opinion, as of right now, btrfs is not yet ready to be used as
default
Regards,
Marc
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yes, I'd veto btrfs as the default as well. I lost a huge chunk of
data on a btrfs partition a while back, with *no* diagnostics,
recovery tools, help from Google, etc. Screw speed - unless it's rock
solid and *simple* to back up, maintain, diagnose and manage, I won't
use it.
The most helpful approach would be provide bug reports, when btrfs will
be proposed as a default file system (again). Without bug reports, real
numbers etc. is hard to make any decision. I don't wish to test on my
machine, so I would be glad for hard data from others ;-)
(btw the typo in subject is terrible).
Marcela
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
