On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:53:06 +0000
"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:

> When I did the big OCaml codegen fix/update in F18 recently, I just
> bumped these package versions in Rawhide, merged the change back to
> F18, and rebuilt them only in F18.  The upshot is that these aren't
> really a problem now and will fix themselves through routine updates
> over time.

Why not build them in rawhide? The codegen fix went in sooner there?

Note that in the future to avoid this: 

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches

Personally, I'd say just rebuild them in rawhide, since people yum
upgrading from f18 would hit this and rawhide doesn't mind rebuilds. :) 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to