On 11/13/2012 02:48 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040...@freenet.de
<mailto:rc040...@freenet.de>> wrote:
On 11/13/2012 05:05 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I own several packages that use cmake and I've taken to setting the
release type to RelWithDebugInfo like you suggest. One question
I've had
but never gotten around to asking is: Regardless of whether you use
Release or RelWithDebugInfo, should we be building with -O3? It
seems
odd that the rpm macro defaults to doing something that is
explicitly
against the packaging guidelines.
Your sentence confuses me or I am missing somthing.
The FPG intention is to mandate using RPM_OPT_FLAGS. These so far
have contained -O2. So, unless something has recently been changed,
using -O3 would qualify as a bug somewhere.
And regardless, the question is if -O3 is explicitly against the
guidelines, why is it in the rpm macros file at all.
-03 isn't directly against the guidelines.
Not using or overriding vital parts of RPM_OPT_FLAGS is against the
guidelines.
Overriding optimization levels (here: -O3) would be amongst these
"prohibited items".
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
