oddly this looks a lot like the Ubuntu release cycle if you replace stable with LTS
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Jason Brooks <jbro...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote: > > No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo >> instead of 12. >> Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates) >> instead of 12. >> > > The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on to > avoid maintaining more than two releases at a time. > > If it went back and forth between stable and preview, you'd have three > supported releases at once in the second half of year two. > > >> Regards, >> Matthieu Gautier >> >> >>> How about NO? >>> >>> https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.**net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/** >>> tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_**1280.jpg<https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_1280.jpg> >>> >>> >> > > -- > > @jasonbrooks > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel> -- Mark Bidewell http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
