Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said: > > > I've just created > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which > > > contains plan how to successfully move from current jpeg6 API/ABI to more > > > recent > > > jpeg8 API/ABI for Fedora 19. > > > > > > All packages which depends on libjpeg.so will have to be rebuilt. Since I > > > have > > > provenpackager privileges, I will cook some script which will rebuild all > > > pkgs automatically so no action will be required from maintainers. > > > > > > If there are no objections against this approach, I will start with this > > > task > > > next week. > > > > Ouch. I can see a need for a compat library for some period of time here - > > the jpeg6 API has certainly been around for quite a long while. > > Hm, you are probably right. Since libjpeg is widely used, there might be some > proprietary > apps which require it. > > In my opinion we can just ship compat libjpeg.so.* without development files > for > some time. Or do we need devel files as well?
Just the .so should be fine. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
