Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> said: > It really depends on what 'kernel-minimal' is. If it's the > same kernel (identical vmlinuz) with groups of modules, then I'm > assuming this is the same as what everyone else is proposing.
I would think the only "sane" way would be to just change the packaing, not actually build multiple kernels (or even multiple packages with kernels). For example, a "kernel-minimal" that has the kernel and the "core" modules loaded in most installs (e.g. filesystems like ext4 and NFS, dm, network support like ipv6 and iptables, and virtio-type drivers), a "kernel-common" that has the rest of the current contents of "kernel" (and probably obsoletes "kernel"), and then the current "kernel-modules-extras". There will always be requests to move modules from -common to -minimal, and it shouldn't be a big fight (I would bet most requests would be pretty obvious). That already exists some for -modules-extras. -- Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
