On 9 October 2012 15:24, Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> wrote: > On Tue, 09.10.12 16:53, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> If you want audit-like semantics with crashing if we cannot write, then > use something else, not the journal. The journal is supposed to be > robust and do the right thing so that you can leave it unnatteneded and > whatever happens it didn't spill the disk or become unavailable. It's > supposed to be "zero maintainance". So in those cases rsyslog would be required, but would be seen as a post-install step. EG what you are looking at is building a GNOME-OS and for those sorts of tablets, etc the journal is right for that. The other cases like at a Hospital, trading firm or various .gov.XX then having rsyslog installed with audit post would be the way to get the needed features. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it." Linus Torvalds "Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
