On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/27/2012 11:29 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> I'd agree, but git hashes don't do in sortable order. I mean, they >> do, but only Discordian sort. > > > I'm not suggesting you have rpm sort on git hashes. The release string is > required to have a numeric prefix before the date and/or git hash. I'm > talking about removing the date part of it so that you still have a numeric > prefix (e.g. 0.5) before the git hash. Ordering happens on the 0.X part, > not on the git hash.
OIC. Right. It's Friday. Worth considering. -J > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
