On 09/07/12 08:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:54:38 +0200 Matej Cepl <mc...@redhat.com> wrote:On 06/07/12 22:55, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Package html401-dtds (orphan) > comaintained by: gnat Does it mean, we won't have HTML 4.01 DTDs packaged in Fedora? That sounds bad. Also, how can orphan be comaintained? Won't comaintainer be automatically elevated to a maintainer?There's no setup to do that automatically, it's up to the comaintainer to note that the maintainer orphaned the package and take ownership. Normally you would think if you were co-maintaining something you would notice if it was orphaned I would think... kevin
-1 That's poor app design and, IMO, a bug. The software *should* allow the maintainer to relinquish responsiblities and either A) designate a new maintainer OR B) have maintainership automatically shift to the next co-maintainer (for simplicity, this could be based on date commit rights were granted to the package's repo) Both use cases should be supported because allowing a co-maintained package to be orphaned without the consent of *ALL* maintainers makes no sense. ---Brett.
pgpvD7oE3zNKM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
