On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote: > On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote: >>> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement >>> >>> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction. >> That is just untrue. SecureBoot can be used to make sure you only run >> the software you intended to run, which is impossible without >> SecureBoot (e.g. this cannot be done with a TPM). The idea is solid, >> the technology is or can be made solid. > No. The user is not in control here. Microsoft is in control. Remove Microsoft's keys, problem solved. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Gerry Reno
- Re: *countable infinities only Gregory Maxwell
- Re: *countable infinities only Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Chris Adams
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Miloslav Trmač
- Re: *countable infinities only Gerry Reno
- Re: *countable infinities only Miloslav Trmač
- Re: *countable infinities only Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: *countable infinities only Bill Nottingham
- Re: *countable infinities only Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Adam Jackson
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Adam Jackson
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones
- Re: *countable infinities only Adam Jackson
- Re: *countable infinities only Peter Jones