Jaromir Capik (jca...@redhat.com) said: > You're partially right. > If we talk about the Fedora's package name, then it could remain untouched. > But since the new upstream name had to be changed and I wanted others to know > they're installing the -ng version, I changed the name to procps-ng. > Moreover, I initially wanted to introduce both version concurrently > and later I decided to drop procps completely because of unclarities > in the resolution of virtual provides.
Right, having multiple procps-style packages installed at once is way more effort than it would ever be worth. > Packaging guidelines also say that package names should match the upstream > tarball or project name and the name change seemed to me as the clearest > and best solution. Is it intended to ever name it back if the older version dies off? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
