On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 22:44 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Mon, 07 May 2012 22:24:15 +0200, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > 4) I disagree with the contention that this should all be done via the > > retrace server. For the retrace server to work, you have to have > > all of the following: > > > > - all relevant binaries and DSOs built in Fedora > > When we are considering Fedora Bugzilla bugreports then it is valid. > Custom downloaded binaries will not have this compressed-.symtab anyway.
Any rpm built by anyone with this feature will have this information in it. Be it a locally rebuild fedora rpm such as a scratch build or a totally custom rpm. Just like we build debuginfo rpms for such rpms. > > For this to provide a reasonable amount of information, all you need is: > > - an unwinder > > The problem is .symtab is not sufficient information for a backtrace. You keep saying this, but I and several others think that having it is a sufficient for a great many things. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
