On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Matthias Runge <mru...@matthias-runge.de> wrote: > On 26/04/12 00:21, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> >> wrote: >>> My proposal is at >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/RevitalizingSponsorshipProposal >>> >>> I've run this by FESCo, whose response was favorable, so I'm sending >>> this to a larger audience. Please let me know what you think. >> >> Looks good to me. I was unaware that sponsors are (currently) also >> provenpackagers. I've considered the idea of becoming a sponsor > Yes, this is a good step ahead. I never understood, why sponsoring is > mightier (in the view of doing harm) than proven packager. A sponsor can > elevate packagers and approve packages, a proven packager could demolish > all packages.
Well the idea was that a sponsor is a trusted packer so why would he "demolish all packages"? IMO the bar for being a provenpacker shouldn't be that high. Having more manpower (as in people that can fix things globally) should be something we want .... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
