Miloslav Trmač wrote: > AFAICT there is a clear FESCo consensus that the list can not be > exhaustive.
That's good news.
> Essentially, asking for a promise to promote automatically if a
> checklist is met is equivalent to asking for permission to promote
> even if the software is known to be broken and/or unfixable.
+1
Promotion MUST be a case by case decision!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
