On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 07:27:13PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > On 03/28/2012 06:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Oh no. Nobody's seriously considering UEFI ARM platforms without ACPI, > > are they? > > Wait, I thought there was some kind of "flattened device tree" or > something that the ARM folks thought would let them avoid ACPI. Did that > not pan out? Maybe MS put the kibosh on it?
I'd been under the impression that flattened device tree was a migratory path before systems adopted UEFI/ACPI. UEFI doesn't have its own device tree and so relies on the platform to provide one - in theory that could be something that looks like the Linux device tree spec, but there's no description of how to express that in UEFI at present. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
