On 03/22/2012 02:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: >> > Exactly! Ultimately what we need is FESCo to document what are the >> > requirements of being promoted to a primary architecture and then it's >> > the ARM SIGs job of ensuring they adhere to the requirements, provide >> > viable workable alternatives that are acceptable to FESCo, or provide >> > proof that the requirement will be met within an agreed time frame.
> ARM should most definitely NOT be approved as a primary architecture before > all the requirements are actually met! Hold on, these requirements are something you just made up to suit your argument. Andrew. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
