On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:26:58PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > > The expectation would be that the architecture maintainers have fixed > > everything before moving to being a primary architecture, so this should > > only be an issue if maintainers or upstream manage to come up with new > > breakage. But yes, it forces people to care about something they might > > previously have ignored, so I guess that's an advantage. > > And we've already being doing that with the vast majority of issues > already fixed and committed to mainline.
Agreed. I just mean that it's not a terribly significant benefit to becoming a primary architecture. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
