Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Packages that were affected via rpm dependencies were listed as part of
> the announcement. I looked through the list for packages I cared about and
> in one case let the asterisk packers know about a dependency of asterisk
> that was on the list that I didn't want to maintain and they picked it up.
That list was several screens long. I don't think it's fair to blame
packagers for having missed their package in it, and only noticed once the
"broken dependencies" whines started trickling in.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
