Matthew Garrett wrote:
> And the people working on Gnome feel that adopting a bad specification
> would cost more than enhancing this interoperability would provide.
And that's exactly my complaint: GNOME doesn't give a darn about
compatibility with other desktops and isn't willing to make ANY sacrifices
for compatibility. ALL the recent work on interoperability came from the KDE
camp (and/or, more recently, from Canonical). As a striking example, BOTH
the Qt theme to look like GTK+ (QGtkStyle) and the GTK+ themes to look like
Qt/KDE (gtk-qt-engine, oxygen-gtk etc.) come from the Qt/KDE camp, GNOME
developers don't care at all about interoperability in either direction.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
