On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:36:32AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > The downgrades would actually be better than having an unsupported > system that doesn't get any updates ever. The assumption here is that > the downgrades aren't introducing any security or fundamental > functionality issues--hopefully, 'long term support' means that they > would fix such problems.
If people can live with RHEL/CentOS/SL' "older" packages *and* need LTS, why would they *ever* start using Fedora anyway (when they know they have to move to RHEL/CentOS/SL at some point anyway). Sorry, this is really a *very* weird scenario. -- -- Jos Vos <j...@xos.nl> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
