On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:14:20 -0800 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote: > > > > > >> fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but > > >> geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so > > > > > > It has been reported before and in the right place: > > > > > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/fawkes > > > > > > An update of "geos" is incompatible and should not have been > > > published: > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14436/geos-3.3.1-1.fc16 > > > > And an arguable abuse of the process, a submitter setting karma: 1 > > and then giving their own update the requisite karma++ to get it > > pushed to stable almost immediately. :( > > My recollection is that FESCo has specifically decided that > maintainers must not +1 their own updates, but this does not appear > to be stated anywhere in the updates policy: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy > > Perhaps it should be updated. Yeah, we should update that. See also: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277 kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
