Am 21.11.2011 22:53, schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > On 11/21/2011 09:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Unconvincing. To "reassure ownership" periodicially won't be sufficient. >> It would be just another button to click (like FAS password or cert >> renewal) and would not guarantee that the packages would be maintained >> properly and that tickets would be dealt with. A "sign of life" from a >> person does not imply that the person's packages are (well-)maintained. >> > > Well if people want more controversial proposal of sign of live that's > relatively easier to accomplish. > > Revoke that maintainers package privileges for $next-release if he does > not respond to bug reports in timely manner in GA releases and orphan > his package. > > Arguable a bit drasting but at the same time far more effective clean up > process.
+1 nothing is more frustrating for users as ignored bugreports reintroduced from release to relase while th eonly response is from bugzapper about EOL of the release
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
