2011/10/24 Miloslav Trmač <m...@volny.cz>: > 2011/10/24 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp...@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> 2011/10/24 Chris Adams <cmad...@hiwaay.net>: >>>> * Discussion about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove >>>> (t8m, 17:26:45) >>> >> >> Cool idea. Next I suggest to stop using >> /bin >> /sbin >> /lib >> /lib64 >> in F19, and not to create these links on freshly installed systems in F20. > > What about > * the FHS?
Standards can be updated. > * "#! /bin/sh" in thousands of existing scripts? Indeed, I forgot about it. Backward compatibility is important. In any case #!/usr/bin/env sh seems to be more portable solution. > > If anything, wouldn't it make more sense to move stuff in the opposite > direction, from /usr/bin to /bin ? "usr" doesn't really mean anything > - originally it was used because the filesystem format couldn't > support more than 64MB(?) in a single volume, so the system had to be > split to / and /usr. > > Also, Fedora already sort-of has a system for stateless OS images - > see /etc/sysconfig/readonly-root. What will happen to it? > > And more importantly, what is the overall benefit to our users? I > can't find anything compelling in the "Benefit to Fedora" section (if > /usr/ can be snapshotted, why not / ?); AFAICT this requires changing > 257 packages for mostly aesthetic reasons. > Mirek > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
