On 10/24/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not really seeing why this'd be a better approach than what I > suggested above.
This isn't better in case we don't ship -sysvinit sub-package. This was meant as a general approach which should work even if a user has installed sysvinit scripts from a sub-package (not mysql case). > It requires more assumptions about the behavior of the > systemd-sysv-convert code than I'm comfortable with --- in particular, > that that subsystem still keeps information around after a conversion > has been completed. Yes, it's not perfect. But feasible from my pov. Honza -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
