On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Genes MailLists <li...@sapience.com> wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 04:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > if there would be much more care by introducing new features/replacements > > my understanding for the fear of update thmen after that would be much > higher > > > > as long fedora is shooting out new features without any care if they are > > really ready fdora should also update them - systemd as best example > > > > and no - this is not flaming - this is simply the wish if i get new > > software which is not really ready but seems good anough for a GA-release > > i expect updates of this software are more than good enough to be push > ASAP > > > This argument makes some sense (if a bit overblown) - we do seem more > concerned about not updating than not releasing in the first place - > e.g. while its true we delayed systemd - the general noise level > suggests it was still not solid enough ... once its released 'core' > components get less love coz making changes is bad ... > > This seems a bit odd ... we're cutting edge - but if the cut smells > then its too bad ... > > I still strongly advocate for a rolling release - where single large > core changes can be serialized if need be into the testing repo for as > long as it takes to stabilize them (or pulled back out as a unit) - and > smaller improvements and bug fixes can continue unimpeded ... now we > could be truly leading edge. > > gene/ > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > A few years ago, I would have probably been against a rolling release system for Fedora. But with the improved infrastructure over the last year or so, I would actually like to see Fedora transition to such a system. The only disappointing thing is that there'll be no more release parties... :(
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
