On 09/16/2011 08:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:48 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof
session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'...
I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing
X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop
Summit), and session management itself is really difficult.
Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from
the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly
and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all
things - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc.
We aren't really talking about systemd any more, in this branch of the
thread.
Were not? From:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd
systemd System and Session Manager
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Sr. Software Engineer III
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
