On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@redhat.com> wrote: > Your whole argument is just void. There is not a single difference > between "external" packages and (sub-)packages. There is one difference: with subpackages it is trivial to write a Requires: that 1) is always strict enough and 2) is always satisfied. For external packages achieving both requires non-trivial human effort. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Andreas Schwab
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Andreas Schwab
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Andreas Schwab
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Andreas Schwab
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Andreas Schwab
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Miloslav Trmač
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Andreas Schwab
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Matthew Garrett
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Matthew Garrett
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Simo Sorce
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? seth vidal
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Michael Schwendt
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Bryn M. Reeves
- Re: To Require or not to Require? Matthew Garrett