Petr Sabata (con...@redhat.com) said: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:18:18PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Petr Sabata (con...@redhat.com) said: > > > > Will cpupowerutils obsolete cpufreq so old deployments of cpufreq can be > > > > garbage-collected ? (yes most people will not need it, but is it not > > > > better to > > > > have something current installed rather than cpufreq living on forever? > > > > I'm > > > > thinking of eternal yum-updated systems here) > > > > > > It's not the case at the moment. > > > > > > I was thinking about it before and didn't really like it. But it's > > > just a matter of taste and having yet another Obsoletes/Provides pair in > > > cpupowerutils.spec won't hurt. > > > > It's probably simplest to have the obsoletes just to get the old code off > > the system. > > I put Obsoletes (not Provides) in there and in seemed to make no difference. > cpupowerutils update or clean cpupowerutils installation don't remove cpuspeed > from the system.
You have: Obsoletes: cpuspeed <= 1:1.5-15 However, the currently built version is 1.5-15.fc15. The added dist tag makes it compare as greater than just '15'. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
