sön 2011-06-05 klockan 15:30 +0200 skrev drago01: > 2011/6/5 Alexander Boström <a...@root.snowtree.se>: > > [...] > > Consider a hypothetical bash-uncompletion which just blacklists tab > > completion in those cases where it doesn't make sense but never adds any > > new completion sources. Should that be installed by default? It would be > > rather small and light. > > That's makes no sense at all ... as if saving a couple of hundred of > kb helps anything. > Any argument based on size here is rather pointless.
I agree. bash-completion is small enough. Even if all it did was to get rid of bogus completions it would still offer a better user experience at a small cost so it should be in the default package set. Now it does more than that. /abo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
