On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:54:02 -0500, Tom Lane <t...@redhat.com> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> writes: > > lordsawar has a gfdl manual that is installed. Does that need to be > > reflected > > in the license tag such that it should be GPLv2+ and GFDL1.1+, instead of > > just GPLv2+? > > le...@lists.fedoraproject.org would be the right place to ask that, > but I'm pretty sure the answer you'll get is "yes".
OK. > You could possibly split the manual into a documentation subpackage > with its own License: tag if you wanted to keep the license tags clear. In this case I'd like both to be installed together so it is easier to use help. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
