On 2011-02-21, Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> wrote: > RPM traditionally treats unversioned provides as meaning "any version". > Over on perl-devel list, it's been suggested that this is a bug in rpm. > > Googling around, I can't find any specific rationale for why rpm does > this as opposed to say providing version 0. Can anybody enlighten me? > The full story begins on <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672246#c7>.
I'm really interrested why RPM dependecny solver behaves like Paul says and what it is good for. -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
