On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 6:44 AM Timothée Ravier via devel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > From the Fedora Cloud point of view, I am generally supportive of > > this. I would like to see other common filesystem modules re-added > > though (particularly btrfs, but it also probably makes sense to re-add > > xfs and ext4). > > This contradicts the main goal behind this package which is to include as few > modules as possible to reduce the attack surface and thus the need for > updates. When using UKIs, we only need support for the FAT filesystem that is > used to store them in the ESP.
But we don't *have* to store UKIs on the ESP, and we would prefer *not* doing that. And aside from that, those three modules are by far the most used and well-maintained modules. It's not like I'm asking for HFS+ support to be enabled on grub-cc. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
