V Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 11:26:21AM +0000, Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> Adding Jeremy directly on cc: as he knows a lot more about the BTI low
> level bits.
> 
> Peter
> 
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 at 21:52, Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > While attempting to package libuv 1.52.0, I discovered via rpminspect
> > that a change[1] made since 1.51.0 has introduced some assembly that
> > leaves GCC unable to determine whether the resulting binaries are
> > BTI-safe. I am not sure of the best way to approach this. I'm pretty
> > sure that this specific usage is fine, but I don't particularly want
> > to use `-Wl,-z,force-bti` because that could end up hiding a truly
> > unsafe change later on.
> >

New GCC 16.0.1-0.7.fc45 is the trigger
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2439677>.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to