Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Am I missing something, or would this [*] also be binary-incompatible? If
> so, that's very very very much not worth the effort.

+1

I don't think having another Fedora build for x86_64 machines is worth the 
effort. (And it definitely doesn't make sense to replace the true 64-bit 
build with this. Some people need true 64-bit.)

        Kevin Kofler

[*] the x86_32 ABI on the x86_64 ISA

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to