On Di, 16.12.25 16:30, Hans de Goede ([email protected]) wrote: > My primary reason for going with Stubble for now is simply how > much time I've to spend on this. This is not my highest priority > at Qualcomm so I'm mainly doing this as a side-project and > in my own free time. > > Also we need a source of the json files which map DMI strings + > panel EDID to which DTB to use. Stubble provides these json files > and systemd-boot does not. So we need to package Stubble anyways > even if just for the json files.
Hmm, if this is generic data we can certainly look into shipping that in our tree. I have no idea why canonical forked sd-stub, I guess Canonical just does Canonical things... They haven#t submitted any PRs for that mapping data though. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
