On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 at 16:16, Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:31 AM Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2025 at 14:35, Allison King via devel-announce > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseKmsconVTConsole > > > > > > Discussion Thread: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/172602 > > > > > > **This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.** > > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > > > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community > > > feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the > > > Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > > > > > == Summary == > > > This change is to replace the kernel console '''fbcon''' with the > > > userspace console '''kmscon''' in Fedora, to provide an enhanced and more > > > secure console for Fedora users. > > > The long term goal is also to deprecate fbcon/fbdev emulation in the > > > kernel, and this is the first step in this direction. > > > > Generally I think this sounds like a good change... > > > > > == How To Test == > > > Press Ctrl+alt+F3 to switch to the VT console. > > > Login and check if it's running kmscon with ''ps aux | grep tty3'' > > > > Maybe it's obvious if you are actually running kmscon, but I read this > > and wondered how I would check. What is the expected output of this > > command? How would it differ from what I see today on F42? > > > > Presumably I would I see a kmscon process running on tty3? It might > > improve the change proposal to say something like "You should see a > > line in the output showing a kmscon process". > > > > > > > ==== Caveats ==== > > > * Starting graphical application from the console (like "startx") won't > > > work, but you can work around it by using the script ''kmscon-launch-gui > > > startx'' > > > > I don't remember the last time I needed to run startx but what is the > > failure mode if you do run startx from kmscon? Is the > > kmscon-launch-gui command discoverable for users who do want to use > > startx or similar commands? > > > > I know there are people who use startplasma to launch the Plasma > Desktop by hand (since it's a supported method to launch Plasma > Wayland). Does that also fail with kmscon? If so, does that mean we > need wrappers to ensure people don't have to figure this out? > > I don't think the kmscon-launch-gui command is ergonomic or > discoverable, so we probably need to adapt things instead.
How discoverable is startplasma? I would think that is not the norm either and the sort of people that want to use startplasma would be able to find kmscon-launch-gui or you could incorporate that into the startplasma process. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
