On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 3:52 AM Michael J Gruber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-10-06 09:35:47: > > On 06/10/2025 08:55, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > > In my opinion, Fedora Flatpak maintainer could be a maintainer of the > > > flatpak they build even if they install other RPM packages. This does > > > not require them to be RPM package maintainers. > > > > Technically, yes. But if a maintainer wants to build the foo-bar > > Flatpak, they first need to package it as an RPM if it's not available > > in Fedora. > > This is certainly true. > > Though at the moment, we do not lack RPM pachages. We do lack Fedora flatpaks > built from RPMs if we want "Fedora flatpaks" to have any future at all. > > RPM -> flatpak is too difficult for existing packagers, and > impossible for willing contributors who are not packagers.
That may have been true in the past, but I don't think that's true anymore. The entire method of producing Flatpaks from RPMs was redone earlier this year to eliminate the overly-complex modularity tooling that made it unapproachable. The tutorial seems pretty straightforward indeed: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/flatpak/tutorial/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
