Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Jan Drögehoff [email protected] said: > > True, but from what I can tell only developers complained with real > > users either being unaffected or not vocal about it. > > Developers are real users too.
I should clarify that if I refer to users I mean the common end-user that browses the web and maybe plays a few games, not a power-user or developer who has a better grasp of their system. Neal Gompa wrote: > Developers are also the ones that become contributors, and are by far > the most important type of user that we want to encourage to use > Fedora. okay, so we should prioritize the needs of developers when it comes at the detriment of everyone else? How far should this go? You could argue that having SELinux set to enforcing by default comes to the detriment of developers due because common Docker setups fail with it but I don't think that is a reasonable choice to make since it would affect everyone else. a developer being able to ptrace any process under the same user is very useful but at the same time brings no value for normal end-users and server hosters. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
