Christopher, On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 06:11:51PM +0000, Christopher Klooz wrote: > The below change proposal was accidentally sent to the mailing list under a > wrong name.
And the new name is so long I originally missed this. Sorry. The long name also suggests (at least to me) that this is really multiple proposals. It seems to suggest three different policy changes. One for logging and processing kernel addresses, impacting programs needing to inspect e.g. /proc/kallsyms. One for BPF using packages, impacting performance and power consumption. And one for tracing/profiling/debugging user space programs, impacting whether installing such a package works out of the box or not. It would be good to turn this into three separate proposals with input from some of the affected package maintainers to come up with a good way to set these values to make sure when you install a package it works out of the box. I don't think just asking FESCO to pick a default value, force the systemd package maintainers to set that and then hope users will read some documentation to enable their installed packages to work again is a great policy. Cheers, Mark -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
