Dear Florian, On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 7:11 PM Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > That said, I am not sure they are changing all symbol versions in the > > new .so.4 file, perhaps they should reset all symbols versions to > > 4.0.0? > > Yeah, if they don't do that, it's going to be really awkward. > > How set are they on the soname bump? Maybe they'd be open to a review > how to avoid it on GNU/Linux? But that could mean they'll end up with > different sonames on GNU and musl. > I think that it's worth asking upstream [1] about it. Either feature request or discussion would work. https://github.com/openssl/openssl -- Dmitry Belyavskiy
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
