Hi team, Could you help advise what I need for this review? thanks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392647 in review template, 1. For the license part, now all files in the prep'd directory have a license. Or all files within the source tarball should have a license --- means I will need preprocessing until upstream applies the same as well? 2. I have no idea about the warnings below. They have normal permissions in source tarball. ``` seergdb.src: W: strange-permission add_copyrights_to_source_files.patch 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission add_spdx_license_to_markdowns.patch 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb-2.5.tar.gz 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.1 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.metainfo.xml 666 seergdb.src: W: strange-permission seergdb.spec 666 ``` 3. Anything I can do from the maintainer's side? Regards! Yonghang
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
