Em qua., 16 de jul. de 2025 às 16:27, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> escreveu: > > I noticed that AI-generated content has been added to a Fedora package: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pip/pull-request/157# > > Do we have rules about this? > > If not, should we? > > There are obvious concerns about whether such content is copyrightable > (and the implications of that), and whether such content may cause > copyright concerns by replicating training data. Various projects are > currently reckoning with how to handle such contributions. See, for > instance, https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado/pull/6168 . > -- > Adam Williamson (he/him/his) > Fedora QA > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org > https://www.happyassassin.net > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
This discussion interests me as I have been using Gemini a lot to figure out ways to improve my code, either by using copy pasting code into Gemini or using Gemini integration with VS Code or other IDEs. For reference I added this AI usage disclaimer into the latest release Github page of bign-handheld-thumbnailer, which is packaged into Fedora: > This release made heavy usage of Gemini to figure out possible improvements > that could be applied to existing code. > Gemini suggestions are not applied blindly and letting Gemini generate new > code from scratch is avoided as much as possible. So I am very curious if it applies to when I do: 1) A first step of human-written code 2) A second step where I let an AI analyze the code and suggest improvements 3) Then every suggestion is analyzed and validated 4) The useful suggestions are implemented 5) Optionally go back to step 2 I have been doing this process quite a lot recently and have very recently decided a AI Usage Disclaimer is appropriate. Is this enough? Thanks for your time, Mateus Rodrigues Costa -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
