On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 11:38 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki > <s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > So, I'm proposing to remove the support code (and templates, etc.) for > > > this mode of operation from rust2rpm with the next major version, and > > > to replace it with documentation [...] > > Documentation works if people know it exists, so I think it'd be best > > if the program still recognised the --path option and pointed users > > to the relevant pages. > > > > Other than that, the idea is fine. Keeping mostly unused code around > > tends to be a liability. > > Yeah. Making the templates available by some rust2rpm command > invocation is something I was thinking of too, but I didn't initially > want to suggest it ... but it would have the benefit of keeping > development of *all* Rust spec file templates (be they actual jinja2 > templates or stupid copy-paste "templates") within the same project. >
I would like a way for us to keep the workflow with rust2rpm for non-crate rust projects, if we can... There are a few of those that we have in Fedora, and it comes in handy to be able to refresh the spec periodically. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
