Aoife Moloney via devel-announce <devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsAlternativesSystem > Discussion thread - > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-use-update-alternatives-for-managing-nodejs-symlinks-self-contained/158042/2 > > > This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > == Summary == > > We aim to move away from manual management of > <code>/usr/bin/node</code>, <code>/usr/bin/npm</code>, and similar > symlinks to leveraging update-alternatives system. Will this still continue to work on rpm-ostree based systems? Iirc there were problems with update-alternatives, if they are applied in %post (or at least there are some in openSUSE). Cheers, Dan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
