Dne 04. 07. 25 v 12:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 04. 07. 25 11:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:Dne 03. 07. 25 v 21:03 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):rubygem-abrt vondruchI wonder why I see rubygem-abrt listed here, but the relevant ticket, such as [1] is not updated.Updated how?
The initial comment sets some expectations. I would expect that the ticket will be updated with information that "now is the time when the process kicked in and here is reminder to really do something prior this will get retired in x weeks".
My email is orthogonal to bugzilla.See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugsAnybody can follow the bugzilla process to get your package orphaned, as your bugzilla is still in NEW. Those are points 1-5 of the policy. I am not doing that. Feel free to volunteer.
👍
What my email was about are points 7 and 8 of the policy.
This might be some Google deduplication, but I can't say I would receive remainder as per: "and weekly reminders are sent to affected maintainers", while if the BZ was update instead, I would noticed.
Vít
Those are not dependent on the previous points.[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2341297
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
