On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:41:48AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > We currently use -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer on various architectures. > I think we should remove it because it does not work as expected.
I was confused for a minute as my eye tuned out the word '-leaf' in the arg above, so I mistakenly thought you were proposing to remove frame pointers entirely. > Given how pervasive this effect is and that no problems have been > reported so far, I think we can drop -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer from > the build flags. > > Thoughts? I recall the previous discussion around frame pointers was almost exclusively around the main concept of frame pointers in general (ie the main -mno-omit-frame-pointers arg). I don't recall any specific points around the usage of the extra -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer arg, though it was indeed mentioned in the Fedora change proposal[2]. I guess I'd want to hear from the owners of the original change proposal about their rationale / experiance with enabling both args, as opposed to only -mno-omit-frame-pointers. With regards, Daniel [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
