On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:05 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:50 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:37 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no > > > > > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional > > > > > `gnupg2-g13`, `gnupg2-utils`, and `gnupg2-wks` packages. > > > > > > > > In the merge request I see "Recommends: gnupg2-utils", so that one will > > > > be pulled in by default. Those that are neither required nor recommended > > > > are -keyboxd, -g13 and -wks. > > > > > > > > > Alternatively, these optional packages could get pulled in on upgrade, > > > > > but not for "fresh" installs. > > > > > > > > That would be better, to avoid breaking things for those who use those > > > > utilities. The way to achieve that used to be an arcane mystery, but as > > > > it happens, I wrote it down last year: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_one_to_many_replacement > > > > > > Thanks - this is the kind of feedback that I was hoping for. > > > I am not *that* familiar with GnuPG so I probably erred on the side of > > > caution for which things should get pulled in by default. > > > > > > Pulling in *all* new subpackages on upgrade to avoid breaking existing > > > setups sounds like a good idea. > > > Do you have any opinion on which new optional subpackages should or > > > should not get pulled in by default on new installs? > > > > > > For example, dropping "gnupg2 Recommends: gnupg2-utils" should be safe. > > > I am unsure about keeping "gnupg2 Recommends: gnupg2-scdaemon" though. > > > I don't think that is needed by default, but only for SmartCard > > > support? > > > > > > > Would the presence of pcsc-lite be an indicator of smartcard support being > > used? > > Hum. Maybe, yeah? It looks like currently pcsc-lite is only pulled in > by GnuPG on a default Fedora Workstation install. > > So ... if a user installed other packages like "yubikey-manager" or > "web-eid", those pull in pcsc-lite - and in those cases, pulling in > OpenPGP Card support for gnupg2 would make sense too. > > So you would use something like "Recommends: (gnupg2-scdaemon if > pcsc-lite)" if I understand your question correctly? :) >
Yup, that's what I think would make sense. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
