On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:47AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15 2025 at 05:40:43 PM +01:00:00, Richard W.M. Jones
> <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I've no argument that Webex is hot proprietary garbage, just saying
> > that it was once noted as being a blocker.
> 
> Let's agree that anything we cannot fix also cannot be a blocker.
> Third-party proprietary software has had two decades to figure this out.
> That's more than long enough.

Ultimately as a Fedora maintainer I came here to make OSS software great.
When we get to the point that proprietary software needs are imposing a
burden on Fedora maintainers that diverts resources away from making OSS
great, that's a bad tradeoff IMHO.

Once the only remaining major downsides with dropping i686 are proprietary
software[1], it is time to let the respective vendors solve their own
problems and free Fedora maintainers.

With regards,
Daniel

[1] Wine is a curious special case because although it is open source, it
is again mostly there to enable use of proprietary Windows software. I'm
more inclined to give that a pass though, as the Wine devs are actively
working to solve this problem faced by distros. 
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to