On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 12:39:49PM +0000, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > == User Experience == > `lastlog` and `pam_lastlog` don't exist anymore and are replaced by > `lastlog2` and `pam_lastlog2`. They should behave in a similar manner > to the aforementioned artifacts, thus no other change will be > experienced by the user.
I think it's fine if the pam module uses a different name: this is an internal detail in the config. But is there any reason to not provide an alias for the binary under the old name? 'lastlog' has been around forever and we shouldn't have to reteach people to use a different spelling. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
